http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703894304575047282403176858.html?mod=WSJ_economy_LeftTopHighlights#articleTabs%3Darticle
Definitions:
- Procurement: Acquisition of goods (materials, parts, supplies, equipment) required to carry on an enterprise.
- World Trade Organization: the only global international organization dealing with the rules of trade between nations. For more information go to-http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/whatis_e.htm
- Municipalities: A political unit, such as a city, town, or village, incorporated for local self-government
What is this "Buy American" provision in the stimulus package? They basically state that any project that is funded by the stimulus package must get all of its manufactured products from American manufacturers. They also gives the heads of federal departments the ability to waive this provision for multiple reasons. These reasons include whether the provision would not coincide with public interest or whether the manufactured goods made by American companies used in a project would increase the cost by more the 25% or whether the goods manufactured in America were not sufficiently and reasonably produced. To read more about the provision go to http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/23/buy-american-stimulus-opinions-columnists_wto_trade.html. This provision has frustrated not only Canadian companies but also American companies. This deal will hopefully help the trade relationship between these two countries. Between 2008 and 2009 trade between Canada and the U.S. has dropped dramatically.
Will this deal help? Many say that this deal will help but that there will still be much to fix. A U.S. trade representative spokeswoman said that this deal would give companies in Canada access to 7 programs that have an estimated value of $18 billion which is minuscule in comparison to the $787 billion in the stimulus package spending. Personally, I think that this deal will most likely not help the U.S./Canada trade numbers. America's reaction to Canada is a clear example of how America is likely to act with other countries. This could be detrimental to President Obama's plan to double American exports within five years. How can we increase our exports without a good name in the trade game?
Usually when "deals" are made there is something in it for both sides. Is it Canada who is primarily benefiting here, or has it been so difficult to get all products from the U.S. that this deal will speed up stimulus projects?
ReplyDeleteMs. Spengeman,
ReplyDeleteYou bring up a good point. Not only Canada is benefiting from this deal, but the U.S. is also gaining temporary and some permanent access to procurement contracts in Canada. This deal could definitely help get some of the stimulus projects done more efficiently. This deal will also most likely cause an increase of the trade between Canada and the U.S. As it can be seen in the double bar graph in the article the imports and exports between the U.S. and Canada have dramatically decrease between 2008 and 2009.
Hello Anonymous Econ Student,
ReplyDeleteWhat percenatge of our trade has been with Canada over the last few years? What, in fact, does Canada have to offer as goods for us?
Also, is the US using/considering using the tar sands as an oil source?
Megan,
ReplyDeleteYou made me go on a goose chase to find that statistic. 71.9% of U.S. trade is done with Canada. If you wish to look at more percentages with different countries you can go to:
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/toppartners.html#total
Canada's greatest exports to the U.S. are petroleum products(21%), passengers(12.5%), and car parts and accessories(5.1%).
The U.S. is definitely using Canada's tar sands as an oil source. In fact, soon about three quarters of American foreign oil will come from Canada's tar sands.
Thank you for addressing our questions so thoroughly!
ReplyDeleteHi! First, good blog this seems to be a really complex issue. I was just going to ask if you think head of federal companies would really waive provisions because of public intrest or do you think they will use that power for their own benefit and just waive provisions they do not like? And also keep provisions that benefit them at the cost of public intrest? If so, who do you think would be better fit with the power to waive provisions for the stimulus package with the public intrest in mind?
ReplyDeleteThis is a great blog and its very well written.
ReplyDeleteSo this is part of President Obama's stimulus plan? I guess I'm wondering what the current situation is for government funded public projects. It seems that this might cost more and not be very beneficial, although it would be good for American manufactures.